Photo of Lindsay Burke

Lindsay Burke

Lindsay Burke co-chairs the firm’s Employment Practice Group and regularly advises U.S., international, and multinational employers on employee management and culture issues and international HR compliance. She is a key member of the firm's Institutional Culture and Social Responsibility practice, working together with white collar colleagues to conduct culture assessments, internal investigations of executive misconduct, and civil rights and racial equity audits and assessments. Lindsay has been at the forefront of the changing workplace issues impacting employers in the U.S. in the last decade, including #MeToo, Covid-19, and the renewed focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion. She frequently advises employers in relation to their processes and procedures for investigating complaints of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation and trains executive teams and board members on culture risk and the lawful implementation of DEI programs.

Lindsay also guides employers through the process of hiring and terminating employees and managing their performance, including the drafting and review of employment agreements, restrictive covenant agreements, separation agreements, performance plans, and key employee policies and handbooks. She provides practical advice against the backdrop of the web of state and federal employment laws, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Equal Pay Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the False Claims Act, with the objective of minimizing the risk of employee litigation. When litigation looms, Lindsay relies on her experience as an employment litigator to offer employers strategic advice and assistance in responding to demand letters and agency charges.

Lindsay works frequently with the firm’s privacy, employee benefits and executive compensation, corporate, government contracts, and cybersecurity practice groups to ensure that all potential employment issues are addressed in matters handled by these groups. She also regularly provides U.S. employment law training, support, and assistance to start-ups, non-profits, and foreign parent companies opening affiliates in the U.S.

Contact:Read more about Lindsay BurkeEmail

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed several Assembly Bills (AB) and Senate Bills (SB) that expand employee rights and increase workplace compliance obligations for employers.  Here is a rundown on the key new laws.  Unless otherwise specified, the laws take effect on January 1, 2026.Continue Reading California Update: New Employment Laws and Compliance Obligations for 2026

On July 29, 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a memorandum titled “Guidance for Recipients of Federal Funding Regarding Unlawful Discrimination.”  The memorandum purports to offer “guidance” and “Best Practices” to recipients of federal funding, including “non-binding suggestions to help entities comply with federal antidiscrimination laws and avoid legal pitfalls.”  The Attorney General’s memorandum follows Executive Order 14173 (“Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity”), which calls for “ending illegal discrimination and preferences, including DEI” in the private sector, as well as two “technical assistance” documents titled “What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work” and “What To Do If You Experience Discrimination Related to DEI at Work” issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”).  We previously discussed EO 14173 here and the EEOC technical assistance here.Continue Reading DOJ Issues Memorandum for Federal Funding Recipients Addressing “Unlawful Discrimination” Practices

On June 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court altered the landscape for employers facing “reverse discrimination” Title VII lawsuits in the Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Tenth, and DC Circuits, by striking down a rule that had required plaintiffs from “majority groups” to allege additional “background circumstances” to state a prima facie case of employment discrimination.  Examples of “background circumstances to support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority” included statistical data that the employer had engaged in a pattern of discrimination against majority groups or a member of the relevant minority group made the employment decision that allegedly harmed the member of the majority group.   In the other circuits, no such additional pleading requirement was required in reverse discrimination lawsuits.  Justice Jackson authored the Court’s 9-0 opinion, Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Servs., No. 23-1039, and Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Gorsuch.Continue Reading Supreme Court Holds That All Employment Discrimination is Equal: Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Servs.

On May 19, 2025, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a memorandum establishing a DOJ Civil Rights Fraud Initiative.  The Initiative will use the False Claims Act (“FCA”) to “investigate and . . . pursue claims against any recipient of federal funds that knowingly violates federal civil rights laws.”  Educational institutions, federal contractors, grantees, and other entities that receive federal funding should take note of the latest FCA Initiative.  Similar FCA initiatives, such as those focused on collusion and cybersecurity fraud, have resulted in significant related FCA enforcement.Continue Reading Justice Department Establishes Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, Using False Claims Act to Target DEI

On January 21, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14173, titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” (“EO 14173”), which, among other things, revoked Executive Order 11246 (“EO 11246”), a 60-year-old Civil Rights-era directive that prohibited federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin and required federal contractors to take affirmative action to provide equal opportunity in employment. Continue Reading The Executive Order 11246 Grace Period Ends Today (April 21)

            On April 3, 2025, 10 former Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) officials, including former commissioners, general counsel, and Chairs Charlotte A. Burrows and Jenny R. Yang, issued a public letter responding to the recent EEOC technical assistance document, “What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work,” which we described in a previous blog post.  The public letter, “Statement of Former Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Officials on Employer Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts,” refers to the technical assistance document as the “Acting Chair’s document” since that document was issued by Acting Chair Lucas without a Commission vote and thus represents Lucas’s views. Continue Reading Former EEOC Officials Respond to EEOC Technical Assistance Document “What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work”

On March 29, United States embassies across Europe began sending letters and an accompanying “Certification regarding compliance with applicable federal anti-discrimination law” to companies in Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Italy, Luxembourg, and Spain.  This certification purports to apply Executive Order (“EO”) 14173 (“Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity”) to U.S. government suppliers and contractors based in Europe “regardless of their nationality and the country in which they operate.”  As we wrote in a prior alert, the Trump administration intends for EO 14173 to end what it considers to be “illegal preferences and discrimination” including those “under the guise of so-called ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ (DEI) or ‘diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility’ (DEIA)” programs by prescribing required provisions for federal contracts. Continue Reading European Companies Wrestle with U.S. Government’s Anti-DEI Push

On March 19, 2025, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) released two “technical assistance” documents titled, “What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work” and “What To Do If You Experience Discrimination Related to DEI at Work” (“technical assistance”).  The technical assistance follows President Trump’s issuance of Executive Order 14173 (“Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity”) on January 21, 2025, in which the president called for “ending illegal discrimination and preferences, including DEI” in the private sector.  The EEOC and Department of Justice announced in a press release that the purpose of the technical assistance is “to help educate the public about how well-established civil rights rules apply to employment policies, programs, and practices—including those labeled or framed as ‘DEI.’”Continue Reading EEOC Technical Assistance: “What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work”

As explained in a prior blog post, on January 21, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14173 (“Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity”) (the “EO”), establishing new requirements for federal contractors and grant recipients to agree that their compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws is “material to the government’s payment decisions” for purposes of the False Claims Act (“FCA”) and to certify that they do not operate any “programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws.”  On February 21, a federal judge in the District of Maryland granted a preliminary injunction to block these and other portions of the EO, including potential FCA enforcement actions based on the certification provision, as well as a provision of Executive Order 14151 (“Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing”).Continue Reading Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Provisions of DEI Executive Orders

On January 21, 2025, President Trump issued the Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity Executive Order (the “EO”), which revokes Executive Order 11246, a 60-year-old Civil Rights-era directive that prohibited federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin, and required federal contractors to take affirmative action to provide equal opportunity in employment. The EO seeks to “end[] illegal preferences and discrimination” and “promote individual initiative, excellence, and hard work” by ending the use of “dangerous, demeaning, and immoral race- and sex-based preferences under the guise of so-called ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ (DEI) or ‘diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility’ (DEIA)” programs. The EO does so by prescribing required contract provisions for federal contracts and by requiring specific reports from the heads of federal agencies, including identification of private entities for potential investigation, as described further below. The provisions of the EO do not apply to federal or private sector employment and contracting preferences for veterans. Federal contractors and grant recipients have until April 21, 2025 to comply with the EO’s revocation of affirmative action requirements. However, federal contractors, subcontractors, and grant recipients may become subject to the new contract provision requirements imposed by the EO without delay.1Continue Reading President Trump’s “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” Executive Order Targets Federal Contractors and the Private Sector