On the heels of approving SB 699, which heightened the protections and reach of California’s prohibition of employee non-competes under California Bus. & Prof. Code Section 16600 (“Section 16600”) (see our blog post here), Governor Gavin Newsom has now signed AB 1076. AB 1076 further increases the litigation risk for employers that use employee non-competes and, most notably, requires employers to provide notice of any non-competes to current and former employees by early next year. Together, these two new laws, which take effect on January 1, 2024, reinforce California’s strong public policy against employee non-competes and specify new consequences for employers who seek to enforce or enter into such agreements.

As a reminder, SB 699 adds new Bus. & Prof. Code Section 16600.5 to: (1) prohibit an employer or former employer from attempting to enforce a contract (e.g., a non-compete) that is void under Section 16600; (2) grant current, former, and even prospective employees a private right of action for damages and injunctive relief, and to recover attorney’s fees and costs; and (3) expand the territorial reach of California’s prohibition of employee non-competes to apply “regardless of where and when the contract was signed.”

AB 1076 builds on these protections in a number of ways. First, the law expressly confirms California Supreme Court precedent[1] providing that Section 16600 is to be read broadly to void any non-compete agreement in an employment context or non-compete clause in an employment agreement, no matter how narrowly tailored, save for the few enumerated exceptions (for example, the sale of business exception under Section 16601). Second, it clarifies that the scope of Section 16600 is not limited to contracts where the person being restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business is a party to the contract. Third, the law adds new Section 16600.1 to declare it unlawful for employers to include an impermissible non-compete clause in an employment contract or require an employee to enter into an impermissible non-compete, and further provides that a violation of Section 16600.1 constitutes an act of unfair competition. 

Finally, AB 1076 requires employers to provide a written notice by February 14, 2024 to employees and former employees (employed after January 1, 2022) who have entered into a non-compete clause or agreement that is void under California law. The notice must inform such individuals that the clause or agreement is void and be delivered to the individual’s last known address and email address as an individualized communication.

SB 699 and AB 1076 have the potential to drastically reshape the state of employee non-compete law in California. While there is much uncertainty in how courts will interpret these new laws, it is clear that employers face additional risk of litigation if they use impermissible non-competes, including under the new private right of action created by SB 699 and California’s Unfair Competition Law. Employees may also have a clearer path to use California’s Private Attorneys General Act to sue for civil penalties in connection with an employer’s use of an unlawful non-compete provision. Furthermore, it remains to be seen whether and how SB 699 and AB 1076 can be used to bring lawsuits against employers outside California who enter into lawful non-competes with employees who later move to California.

Given these developments, employers should consider taking the following actions:

  • Assess notice obligations as soon as possible given the February 14, 2024 deadline, and begin preparing draft notices and identifying which current and former employees should receive them;
  • Review existing agreement forms or templates to determine whether there are any provisions that should be revised or removed; and  
  • Train managers and staff involved in the hiring and onboarding process regarding these new laws.

Employers with questions about how to comply with these new laws are urged to consult experienced counsel.


[1] Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal. 4th 937.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Carolyn Rashby Carolyn Rashby

Carolyn Rashby provides business-focused advice and counsel to companies navigating the constantly evolving and overlapping maze of federal, state, and local employment requirements. Carolyn’s approach is preventive, while recognizing the need to set clients up for the best possible defense should disputes arise.…

Carolyn Rashby provides business-focused advice and counsel to companies navigating the constantly evolving and overlapping maze of federal, state, and local employment requirements. Carolyn’s approach is preventive, while recognizing the need to set clients up for the best possible defense should disputes arise.

As a senior member of Covington’s Institutional Culture and Social Responsibility Practice Group, Carolyn has co-led significant investigations into workplace culture, DEI issues, and reports of sexual misconduct and workplace harassment.

As an employment lawyer with over two decades of experience, Carolyn focuses on a wide range of compliance and regulatory matters for employers, including:

  • Conducting audits regarding employee classification and pay equity
  • Advising on employment issues arising in corporate transactions
  • Strategic counseling on a wide range of issues including discrimination and harassment, wages and hours, worker classification, workplace accommodations and leave management, performance management and termination decisions, workplace violence, employment agreements, trade secrets, restrictive covenants, employee handbooks, and personnel policies
  • Drafting employment contracts and offer letters, separation agreements, NDAs, and other employment agreements
  • Advising on employee privacy matters, including under the California Consumer Privacy Act
  • Providing guidance on use of AI in the workplace and development of related policies
  • Leading anti-harassment and other workplace-related trainings, for employees, executives, and boards

Carolyn also works frequently with the firm’s white collar, privacy, employee benefits and executive compensation, corporate, government contracts, and cybersecurity practice groups to ensure that all potential employment issues are addressed in matters handled by these groups.

Photo of Christen Sewell Christen Sewell

Christen Sewell counsels private and public companies and executives on all aspects of employee benefits and executive compensation.

Christen has a particular focus on benefits issues for start-ups and emerging growth companies, including:

  • Advising on the design, compliance, and administration of stock options

Christen Sewell counsels private and public companies and executives on all aspects of employee benefits and executive compensation.

Christen has a particular focus on benefits issues for start-ups and emerging growth companies, including:

  • Advising on the design, compliance, and administration of stock options and equity-based plans and arrangements.
  • Drafting and negotiating executive compensation arrangements, including, employment, retention, change in control, and separation agreements.

Christen also advises clients on:

  • Tax-qualified retirement plans
  • Health and welfare plans
  • Non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements
  • Bonus and incentive plans
  • Corporate transactions (M&A, joint ventures, financings, spin-offs, public offerings, SPACs)

Christen’s expertise covers:

  • Code Section 409A deferred compensation rules
  • Tax rules governing equity compensation
  • Golden parachute rules under Code Section 280G
  • ERISA
  • COBRA
  • PPACA
  • GINA
  • HIPAA
Photo of Ali Mojibi Ali Mojibi

Ali is a trial lawyer who has tried cases for leading global businesses in telecommunications, medical devices, and biotech. IP Law360 and other media have covered Ali’s skillful trial work. Most recently, Ali served as trial counsel for Flatiron Health in a bench…

Ali is a trial lawyer who has tried cases for leading global businesses in telecommunications, medical devices, and biotech. IP Law360 and other media have covered Ali’s skillful trial work. Most recently, Ali served as trial counsel for Flatiron Health in a bench trial in SDNY and, prior to that, for Johnson & Johnson in a three-month trial in California Superior Court.

Ali advises clients with their most complex legal challenges in matters that benefit most from his diverse background (engineering, medical sciences, and sales):

  • Patent and trade secret litigation
  • Product liability
  • Technology and healthcare litigation
  • Enforcement of restrictive covenants (non-competes and non-solicitation)
  • Founder/executive disputes (corporate ownership and control)
  • Licensing disputes
Photo of Nori Lu Nori Lu

Nori Lu focuses her practice on counseling clients on employment law compliance and risk mitigation. She advises companies on a broad range of employment-related matters, including personnel policies, employment contracts, workplace investigations, hiring, discipline, termination, and wage and hour compliance. She conducts employment-related…

Nori Lu focuses her practice on counseling clients on employment law compliance and risk mitigation. She advises companies on a broad range of employment-related matters, including personnel policies, employment contracts, workplace investigations, hiring, discipline, termination, and wage and hour compliance. She conducts employment-related diligence and advises on aspects of transactions involving the transfer and retention of personnel. She also has experience litigating claims related to employee restrictive covenants, trade secret misappropriation, wage and hour, discrimination, and retaliation.

Nori was previously a member of the firm’s corporate practice and has experience advising private and public companies in connection with venture capital financings, mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance matters, and commercial transactions.