Kodak recently announced that it is increasing the benefits provided under its defined benefit plan. Kodak will credit an additional 3% of pay each year under its cash balance pension plan instead of making a matching contribution of up to 3% of pay under its 401(k) plan. In connection with
Continue Reading Reducing Pension Costs By Increasing Defined Benefit Pensions: Kodak’s Innovative Approach
Richard C. Shea
Richard Shea is immediate past chair of Covington’s Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation practice. Richard is widely regarded as the nation’s leading authority on cash balance, pension equity, and other complex benefit plan designs. His practice spans the full breadth of activities needed to help his clients resolve novel, sensitive, or intractable issues. His approach focuses on developing important new legal insights and ideas, and then combining them into effective litigation, legislative, regulatory, and benefit design strategies for his clients. The representative matters described below offer a sampling of the important and challenging assignments he has handled.
Before joining Covington in 1991, Richard served as Associate Benefits Tax Counsel at the Treasury Department, where, together with his colleagues at the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service, he was responsible for developing federal tax legislation and regulations governing employee benefits and executive compensation.
MyRAs: Why Sophisticated Plan Sponsors Ought to Consider Them
As many of you have no doubt heard, President Obama introduced a new retirement savings vehicle, known as a myRA, in his State of the Union address. At first blush, the program appears aimed exclusively at employees with no company-sponsored retirement plan and therefore of little interest to employers…
Continue Reading MyRAs: Why Sophisticated Plan Sponsors Ought to Consider Them
Supreme Court To Resolve Whether Severance Pay for Layoffs Is Subject to FICA Tax
Earlier today, the Supreme Court agreed to review the Sixth Circuit’s decision United States v. Quality Stores. In that decision, the Sixth Circuit sided with taxpayers and concluded that certain severance payments that qualify as supplemental unemployment benefit payments (or “SUB” payments) for federal income tax purposes are not…
Continue Reading Supreme Court To Resolve Whether Severance Pay for Layoffs Is Subject to FICA Tax
Plan Documents Should Not Be Rewritten When an SPD Does Not Disclose Wear-Away, Industry Groups Say
In an amicus brief filed last week, the ERISA Industry Committee and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America stated that a court should not rewrite a plan document, or penalize the administrator who follows the plan document, merely because a summary plan description does not disclose wear-away…
Continue Reading Plan Documents Should Not Be Rewritten When an SPD Does Not Disclose Wear-Away, Industry Groups Say
Permanent Labor Market Shift Signals Job Insecurity and Diminished Wages and Benefits, Economists Warn
Reflecting on the labor market on this Labor Day, we note that many economists are predicting that, unlike prior recessions, employment and wages will not bounce back after the current economic downturn that began in 2008. Employers will retain significant bargaining power in US and overseas labor markets, likely leading…
Continue Reading Permanent Labor Market Shift Signals Job Insecurity and Diminished Wages and Benefits, Economists Warn
Celebrating the Arrival of Windsor Guidance: Same-Sex Marriages Will Be Recognized For Federal Tax Purposes Based on Place of Celebration
The IRS issued guidance today defining same-sex marriage for purposes of federal tax rules. Following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Windsor last June invalidating section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), federal law no longer limits the definition of marriage to opposite sex spouses. However,…
Continue Reading Celebrating the Arrival of Windsor Guidance: Same-Sex Marriages Will Be Recognized For Federal Tax Purposes Based on Place of Celebration
Supreme Court’s DOMA Decision Has Significant Implications for Employers and Employee Benefit Plans
Earlier today in United States v. Windsor, the Supreme Court struck down section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”). Section 3 of DOMA limits the definition of marriage for purposes of federal law to marriage between individuals of the opposite sex. The Court held that DOMA deprives same sex couples of due process in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The Court’s ruling applies to marriages recognized under state law; the Court did not address whether the Constitution requires states to recognize same sex marriage.
The Court’s opinion notes that DOMA affects over “1,000 statutes and numerous federal regulations.” Many of the affected statutes and regulations relate to employee benefits. As a result, the decision is likely to affect the benefits provided under employee benefit plans and the tax treatment those benefits receive. In some cases, the Court’s decision could have implications for benefits that have already been paid. We encourage employers to review their benefit plans and plan administration to identify changes that might be required or desirable as a result of the ruling.
Continue Reading Supreme Court’s DOMA Decision Has Significant Implications for Employers and Employee Benefit Plans
2014 Administration Proposal Would Eliminate ESOP Dividend Deduction
The Obama Administration’s 2014 budget includes a proposal to eliminate the deduction for dividends paid on employer stock held by an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”). The proposal would be effective for dividends paid after the date the budget is enacted. Under the proposal, the deduction would continue to be…
Continue Reading 2014 Administration Proposal Would Eliminate ESOP Dividend Deduction
5 Privacy and Data Security Measures That Can Protect Your Company Against Trade Secret Theft by Employees
As we have previously discussed, companies face a growing threat that trade secrets and other critical business information will be taken by employees and other insiders. Protecting business critical information is not simple. Companies need a holistic approach that implicates multiple areas of the law, including data security, privacy,…
Continue Reading 5 Privacy and Data Security Measures That Can Protect Your Company Against Trade Secret Theft by Employees
Why Is a Benefits Lawyer Talking about Trade Secret Theft?
At a recent forum in New York, a team of Covington & Burling LLP lawyers addressed the growing concern among companies that their most valuable assets might just walk out the front door on a thumb drive in an employee’s pocket or otherwise be taken by company insiders. Although much of the discussion in this country is focused on securing systems from cyber-attacks, Michael Chertoff (former Secretary of Homeland Security and now Senior Of Counsel at Covington) noted that focusing only on attacks from outside a company is like locking a door but leaving a window open. The threat from insiders is substantial, and addressing this threat involves many disciplines, including employee benefits and executive compensation.
Protecting business critical information is not simple. It involves identifying which information is critical, designating that information confidential, establishing practices, procedures, and policies to maintain confidentiality, and being prepared to address immediately breaches that occur. Each step implicates several areas of the law, including data security, privacy, intellectual property, white collar crime, employment, employee benefits and executive compensation, corporate and securities, insurance coverage, and crisis management. For example, the recent White House initiative to combat trade secret theft identified human resources policies as a key area of focus in developing best practices to protect trade secrets.
Continue Reading Why Is a Benefits Lawyer Talking about Trade Secret Theft?