On September 30, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service issued Revenue Procedure 2019-39, which finalizes important changes to how sponsors and employers can ensure 403(b) plan compliance.  The guidance is a welcome update from the Service, which initiated a regular system of remedial amendment periods for 403(b) plans in 2013, with the first period ending on March 31, 2020.  Most significantly, Revenue Procedure 2019-39:

  • Makes permanent the system of remedial amendment periods, during which an employer may retroactively amend its 403(b) plan or adopt a pre-approved 403(b) plan to correct a “form defect” (e., a defect in the terms of the plan that causes the plan to fail a § 403(b) requirement);
  • Clarifies that a retroactive amendment to correct a form defect is only permitted where the plan has been operated in compliance with the § 403(b) requirement;
  • Establishes deadlines to adopt amendments that correct form defects as well as deadlines to adopt discretionary amendments (e., amendments that do not remedy a form defect);
  • Confirms that the Service will not review individually designed 403(b) plans through a determination letter process;
  • Sets out a cyclical system in which pre-approved 403(b) plan sponsors may seek Service approval of plans; and
  • Announces the Service’s intent to provide additional guidance related to 403(b) plans, including its intent to include changes to the § 403(b) requirements on its annual Required Amendments List and the Operational Compliance List.

The Service intends to issue additional guidance in the next several years to address the procedures announced in Revenue Procedure 2019-39.

Individually Designed Plans: Recurrent Remedial Amendment Periods and Amendment Adoption Deadlines

During a remedial amendment period, a sponsor has the opportunity to correct a form defect in its individually designed 403(b) plan by retroactively amending the plan to eliminate the defect or timely adopting a pre-approved 403(b) plan.  A “form defect” is: (i) a provision or the absence of a provision that causes a plan to fail to satisfy the requirements of § 403(b); (ii) a provision that is integral to a § 403(b) requirement that has been changed (by statute, regulation or other IRS guidance); or (iii) the absence from a plan of a provision required by such a change.

The Service will consider an individually designed plan that does not meet the requirements of § 403(b) solely because of a form defect to have satisfied the requirements if the sponsor adopts a remedial amendment on or before the end of the applicable remedial amendment period (or a later date if a statute or the Service provides otherwise).  A retroactive amendment is only permitted where the employer has operated the plan in compliance with § 403(b) throughout the remedial amendment period.  Put another way, the form defect alone—without an accompanying operational failure—must be the sole reason the plan did not satisfy the § 403(b) requirements.  If a form defect cannot be corrected through the remedial amendment process, the sponsor may still be able to be correct it through the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System.

The Revenue Procedure also announces that, beginning this year, the Service will include changes to § 403(b) requirements on its annual Required Amendments List, and will include changes to § 403(b) requirements on its Operational Compliance List.  The inclusion of § 403(b) requirements on these two lists will assist sponsors and eligible employers to develop and maintain robust procedures to ensure plan compliance, and is especially helpful because individually designed 403(b) plans cannot obtain determination letters from the Service.

1.  Recurrent Remedial Amendment Periods & Deadlines for Adoption

The start and end of a remedial amendment period depends on the type of form defect at issue.  A plan termination ends the remedial amendment period, even if the termination predates what would otherwise be the end date as determined by the Revenue Procedure.  Events triggering the start and end of a remedial amendment period for nongovernmental plans are as follows:

 

The remedial amendment periods for governmental plans generally track the same start and end dates as nongovernmental plans, except that the end date may be extended to 90 days after the close of the third regular legislative session of the legislative body with the authority to amend the plan that begins after the event that gives rise to the form defect.

2.    Deadlines for Adoption of Discretionary Amendments

The guidance sets out deadlines for sponsors to adopt discretionary amendments, i.e., amendments that do not remedy a form defect.  For plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2020, a sponsor of a nongovernmental plan must adopt discretionary amendments by the end of the plan year in which the plan is first administered as provided in the amendment.  Sponsors of governmental plans must adopt discretionary amendments by the same date, or, if later, 90 days after the close of the second regular legislative session of the legislative body with authority to amend the plan that begins on or after the date the plan amendment is put into effect.

Pre-approved Plans: Letter Cycles and Recurrent Remedial Amendment Periods

The Revenue Procedure also addresses two matters of concern for employers using pre-approved plans.  First, the guidance sets out a system of cycles during which plan sponsors may submit plans for Service approval.  The Service will review all plans submitted in a particular cycle; upon approval, employers will have approximately two years to adopt the plans.  The first cycle ends on March 31, 2020, and the Service does not expect to begin accepting pre-approved plan letters for the second cycle until 2023.

Second, the Revenue Procedure establishes recurrent remedial amendment periods to correct form defects first occurring after March 31, 2020, which function similarly to the remedial amendment periods for individually designed plans.  The remedial amendment periods are also available to employers who, in good faith, do not adopt an interim amendment because they determine no amendment is required.

Extension of Initial Remedial Amendment Period

In addition to establishing a system for future recurrent remedial amendment periods, the Revenue Procedure provides a limited extension of the initial remedial amendment period for certain form defects.

  • Individually Designed Plans: The extension is to the later of March 31, 2020, or the date that would be the end of the remedial amendment period if calculated under the guidelines set out in the guidance for remedial amendment periods beginning after March 31, 2020. However, for form defects that arise in connection with a change in § 403(b) requirements, this extension is only available if the change in the § 403(b) requirement was effective in or after 2019.
  • Pre-approved Plans: To be eligible for the extension, the form defect must have occurred in connection with a change in the §403(b) requirements (see #3 and #4 on chart above), and may not have first occurred before January 1, 2018. The extension will end no later than the end of the second pre-approved plan cycle, which begins immediately after March 31, 2020.

*          *          *

The Revenue Procedure does not address plan errors arising under Title I of ERISA.  (Title I of ERISA generally applies to 403(b) plans sponsored by organizations that are not governmental or church entities.)  The Department of Labor has separate voluntary compliance procedures that apply to potential ERISA violations.  More information on the Department of Labor’s compliance programs is available here.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Sarah Friedman Sarah Friedman

Sarah Friedman works with private, public, and non-profit clients of all sizes to design and maintain their employee benefits and executive compensation programs. She also advises executives on compensation arrangements in connection with employment, separation, and change-in-control agreements.

In particular, Sarah counsels clients…

Sarah Friedman works with private, public, and non-profit clients of all sizes to design and maintain their employee benefits and executive compensation programs. She also advises executives on compensation arrangements in connection with employment, separation, and change-in-control agreements.

In particular, Sarah counsels clients on compliance with ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code, and agency regulations. She has experience drafting and advising on tax-qualified retirement plans, health and welfare plans, and cash and equity incentive compensation plans. Sarah also advises on ERISA litigation, including on claims related to investment fees and breaches of fiduciary duty.

Sarah maintains an active pro bono practice, both as part of her employee benefits practice as well as outside of it. She has a particular interest in helping clients with life planning documents.

Photo of Julie Edmond Julie Edmond

Julie Edmond is senior counsel in the employee benefits practice. She has extensive experience counseling and litigating in the employee benefits area, including traditional defined benefit, cash balance, 401(k), profit-sharing and ESOPs; executive compensation and § 409A; § 403(b) plans, § 457 plans…

Julie Edmond is senior counsel in the employee benefits practice. She has extensive experience counseling and litigating in the employee benefits area, including traditional defined benefit, cash balance, 401(k), profit-sharing and ESOPs; executive compensation and § 409A; § 403(b) plans, § 457 plans and other plans for tax-exempt organizations; and medical plans (including health reform), cafeteria plans, VEBAs and other welfare plans.  Her experience includes plan selection, formulation and drafting, regulatory compliance, audits, voluntary compliance, prohibited transactions and fiduciary duty requirements, separate line of business issues, use and handling of employee benefits and benefit plans in corporate transactions, and ERISA litigation.