Bolstering the state’s reputation for progressive employment legislation, California has become the first state to ban discrimination based on natural hair and protective hairstyles.  On July 3, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law SB 188, which amends the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), specifying that “hair discrimination targeting hairstyles associated with race is racial discrimination.”  The Creating a Respectful and Open Workplace for Natural Hair (CROWN) Act, takes effect on January 1, 2020, and applies to California employers with five or more employees.

The new law amends the FEHA definition of “race” to include “traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.”  Protective hairstyles include, for example, “braids, locks, and twists.”  As a result, California employers will be barred from maintaining dress code or grooming policies that prohibit natural hair or protective hairstyles, as these policies are more likely to deter Black applicants, and to burden or punish Black employees, than any other group.  The bill explains that “[p]rofessionalism was, and still is, closely linked to European features and mannerisms, which entails that those who do not naturally fall into Eurocentric norms must alter their appearances, sometimes drastically and permanently, in order to be deemed professional.”  The legislation also updates the California Education Code to prohibit similar discrimination in public education.

Although California is the first state to prohibit natural hairstyle discrimination, it trails New York City, which issued guidance in February 2019 explaining that policies banning natural hairstyles or hairstyles most closely associated with black people generally violate the New York City Human Rights Law.  The New York City guidance also explicitly prohibits grooming policies that require employees to change their hairstyle to conform to the company’s appearance standards, including having to straighten or relax hair.

Similar legislation, sponsored by the CROWN Coalition (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair), is pending in New Jersey and was recently passed in New York state and is now awaiting the governor’s signature.

In light of these developments, employers should proactively review their grooming and appearance policies, even those that appear facially neutral, to ensure that they comply with the new prohibitions, are inclusive of all cultures and legally protected categories, and backed by legitimate, objective business needs.  Employers should also take measures to ensure that such policies are applied in a nondiscriminatory manner, including providing training to managers and others involved in the hiring process regarding the new law.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Carolyn Rashby Carolyn Rashby

Carolyn Rashby provides business-focused advice and counsel to companies navigating the constantly evolving and overlapping maze of federal, state, and local employment requirements. Carolyn’s approach is preventive, while recognizing the need to set clients up for the best possible defense should disputes arise.…

Carolyn Rashby provides business-focused advice and counsel to companies navigating the constantly evolving and overlapping maze of federal, state, and local employment requirements. Carolyn’s approach is preventive, while recognizing the need to set clients up for the best possible defense should disputes arise.

As a senior member of Covington’s Institutional Culture and Social Responsibility Practice Group, Carolyn has co-led significant investigations into workplace culture, DEI issues, and reports of sexual misconduct and workplace harassment.

As an employment lawyer with over two decades of experience, Carolyn focuses on a wide range of compliance and regulatory matters for employers, including:

Conducting audits regarding employee classification and pay equity
Advising on employment issues arising in corporate transactions
Strategic counseling on a wide range of issues including discrimination and harassment, wages and hours, worker classification, workplace accommodations and leave management, performance management and termination decisions, workplace violence, employment agreements, trade secrets, restrictive covenants, employee handbooks, and personnel policies
Drafting employment contracts and offer letters, separation agreements, NDAs, and other employment agreements
Advising on employee privacy matters, including under the California Consumer Privacy Act
Providing guidance on use of AI in the workplace and development of related policies
Leading anti-harassment and other workplace-related trainings, for employees, executives, and boards

Carolyn also works frequently with the firm’s white collar, privacy, employee benefits and executive compensation, corporate, government contracts, and cybersecurity practice groups to ensure that all potential employment issues are addressed in matters handled by these groups.

Photo of Michelle York Michelle York

Michelle Barineau York advises U.S. and multinational employers on a broad spectrum of employment law matters. She regularly counsels employers on wage and hour compliance, employee classification, pay equity, and leave-related issues, and she drafts and negotiates key employment documents, including employment agreements…

Michelle Barineau York advises U.S. and multinational employers on a broad spectrum of employment law matters. She regularly counsels employers on wage and hour compliance, employee classification, pay equity, and leave-related issues, and she drafts and negotiates key employment documents, including employment agreements, workplace policies, and separation agreements. Michelle brings substantial experience investigating workplace complaints and frequently partners with white collar colleagues to conduct sensitive internal investigations.

Michelle guides employers through hiring, performance management, and employee terminations, as well as workforce change strategies, including reorganizations, reductions in force, and WARN compliance. She also provides practical, business-focused advice on workplace issues impacting employers, including remote work, employee privacy, and workplace culture, and she offers leading‑edge guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in the workplace.

Michelle helps clients navigate matters involving harassment, discrimination, non-competition, and other issues arising under state and federal employment laws including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Equal Pay Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and the Fair Labor Standards Act. She relies on her experience as an employment litigator to advise clients when responding to agency charges and demand letters, including whistleblower retaliation complaints, and frequently interacts with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, state and local equal employment opportunity agencies, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Michelle works closely with colleagues in employee benefits and executive compensation and corporate groups to address employment matters arising in mergers, acquisitions, and other strategic transactions, and she regularly collaborates with California‑based colleagues on matters implicating California employment law.